Sunday, March 25, 2012

Avatar the Legend of Korra Obligatory First Impressions

Thanks to the efforts of Korra-Nation, we are honored to receive the first 2 episodes of the new addition to the Avatar the Last Airbender series; “The Legend of Korra”. It is with illustrious gratitude that I….. Aw, heck with it – Nickelodeon allowed an early premiere to be launched on the web and I got to see it! Woohoo!

After seeing these first two episodes, I must admit that I’m highly looking forward to this series. It’s very rare for a production to recapture the best elements of a first series within a sequel. Somehow, the creators have introduced an almost entirely new cast and still managed to give it the same quality, lifelike characters and excellent story that the original Last Airbender series had.

I’m stunned by the continued beauty of the background artists. They obviously spent a great deal of time and care to bring the world of Avatar to life during the first series. The tradition continues with “The Legend of Korra”. From the blizzard ridden South Pole right into the streets of Republic City, viewers’ eyes will gorge on the immense visuals provided. There’s barely one frame of the background images that doesn’t deserve its own place in an art gallery.

I’m enchanted by the life that the animators have brought to the characters. The facial expressions are very clear without going over the top. Just as would happen with people, a character’s eyes show the real emotion while that character’s lips say something different. Little actions heighten the humanity of the characters even more. When Korra first begins air bending training, she is not wearing the shawl for the air nomad costume correctly. Tenzin merely helps her adjust the shawl correctly. All the while, the duo is discussing the fact that air bending has been Korra’s elusive element. There’s no verbal acknowledgement of the shawl faux-pas at all. The show is chock full of little *human* things like this.

I’m impressed by the depth of the characters just in these two episodes. Korra is a go-getter type of character. She relishes her avatar skills and isn’t afraid of them. While she’s highly confident in her skills, Korra isn’t arrogant about her title. She is perfectly content to let her actions do her talking and let those around her figure out who she is. Above all else, Korra is excited about life and her avatar training. Elemental bending, martial arts and especially the “Pro Bender Matches” have her full attention.


Don’t think that they only went all out for Korra. Tenzin does his best to remain stoic at all times. However, he can show emotions as well. Tenzin’s eyebrows serve as subtle insight to his character. Surprise, shock, anger, frustration, contentment and sadness are all very nicely conveyed through his eyebrows. At one point, Korra insults him personally. The music of the moment and the lighting effects enhance the emotional atmosphere. It’s in Tenzin’s face – especially his eyebrows- where you see the hurt showing. Both the audience and Tenzin’s daughters can see how much the comment has wounded him. Speaking of which, Tenzin’s kids are already developing personalities just in 2 episodes. In the first episode, they’re pretty much hyper insanity in a flesh suit. The exasperation on their mother, Pema’s, face is priceless. During episode 2, Jinora steps forward as a responsible, bookish type starting to take after her father. Ikki is happy and hyper yet is beginning to understand that sometimes, it’s ok to be serious. Meelo…. is still pretty much asylum material. (Given his young age, you can’t blame him too much.)

Even Korra’s new friends, Mako and Bolin, are showing character depth. It’s obvious that Bolin will bear much of the comic relief of the series while Make will try to remain a straightforward person. But the episode is quick to show that Bolin is both an adept fighter as well as an encouraging teacher. Mako appears to already be showing signs of warming up to Korra.

For those who were worried about how the story could be continued and remain engaging, you will be relieved and excited to know that the creative team of Michael Dante DiMartino and Bryan Konietzko have easily matched their previous high-quality standards set by their original work, “Avatar the Last Airbender”.

Espisode reviews coming next post!

Thanks to tumblr.com for the image.

Saturday, March 17, 2012

That Crazy Thing Called Stalker Love

My YouTube “recommendations” today involved some “This pairing 4ever” shipping video for Sonic the Hedgehog and someone called Amy Rose. Having grown up as a Nintendo girl, I know very little about Sonic.

The few cartoons that I’ve seen don’t involve this pink hedgehog character. Sonic has mostly been running around on his own with Tails or been helping a group of Freedom Fighters. The Freedom Fighters version tends to have him interested in a squirrel(1) lady named Sally Acorn. Their budding relationship is believable. They both have similar goals and become friends while working towards those goals. It’s perfectly plausible that they could become closer and have a romantic relationship as time goes on.

My curiosity forced me to look up this Amy Rose character. According to Sonic News Network, Amy has been in many of the Sonic games, comics and an anime series unrelated to the Freedom Fighters’ universe. She’s decided that she is Sonic’s girlfriend. She follows him everywhere in order to prove it. Sonic doesn’t share her feelings. In other words, Amy is a crazy stalker chick determined to live the lies of a one-sided relationship.

This brings a serious question to mind. Why are characters like Amy Rose so readily embraced by a fandom? Why would anyone think that a stalker and a victim should be a “one true pairing”?

What really gets me is that the stalker character type is a common theme in TV shows. One character pursues another character with the insistent belief that they are meant to be together The pursuer shows no respect or consideration for the victim’s feelings, privacy or freedom. The victim is constantly harassed or forcibly coerced into accepting the stalker’s love.

One of the most famous examples of “stalker love” is the Looney Tunes character “Pepe Le Pew”. He lustfully pursues Penelope Pussycat with no regard to her attempts to derail him. Penelope has done everything from trying to run away from Pepe to causing him physical harm to flat out telling him that she’s not interested. Simply because *he* wants her, Pepe doesn’t care what Penelope says or does. Somehow, this is supposed to be “funny”.

Don’t think that “stalker love” is a men’s only issue either. Reverse the genders and you get a character and cartoon of the same name, “Pucca”. She has no consideration for her “love”, Garu, whatsoever. He may be trying to train, meditate, relax, eat, sleep or work around his home. Pucca willfully interrupts him because *she* wants him to love her. He has clearly shown that he doesn’t like her advances and flees from her. Yet, somehow it’s great comedy to allow Pucca to chase Garu down and force her hugs and kisses all over him.

Another example of this “humor” is the 1989 TV show, Family Matters. From the show’s beginning episode in 1989 to its finale in 1998(2), the nerdy Steve Urkel forces himself upon his neighbor and schoolmate, Laura Winslow’s, home, her life and her heart. Nothing that Laura can say or do will detract Steve’s obsessive belief that she is his one and only true love. Even during the later seasons in which they each find romance separately, Steve still tries to pursue Laura. Apparently this was funny enough to carry nine seasons.

Now Amy Rose joins the stalker character list. I honestly do not understand or find “stalker love” humorous in the least.

Romance should be about two people SHARING feelings for each other. Romance should never be about one character forcing themselves upon another whether that other likes it or not. Why do people continue to consider stalking someone relentlessly as “love”? That is hardly love. It’s harassment and possibly rape. When someone disrespects another character’s feelings, denies them their freedom or to be who they are there’s no “love” there. It’s a case of wanting to be a control freak, a dominator or a self-centered narcissist. Because people who love each other don’t treat each other like glorified personal prizes.

In short, a stalker/victim “one true pairing” just isn’t love. Why is such a relationship embraced by others? I have to wonder what kind of chemical imbalance allows a person to think stalker love is anything but a grotesque farce. I fail to understand why so many people approve of it.


Footnotes:

(1) I have NO clue what Sally is supposed to be. Is she a deer or a chipmunk maybe? Nope, apparently she’s a squirrel according to Sonic News Network http://sonic.wikia.com/wiki/Sally_Acorn

(2) Family Matters entry on the Internet Movie Database http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096579/